Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 07:27
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Verizon quietly makes bold move to keep customers from fleeing - TheStreet
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why do people say "tall, dark, and handsome" when they actually mean "tall, white, and handsome"?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Fed interest rate decision looms as battle over cuts takes surprising turn - TheStreet
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Signs of iPhone 17 Air Spotted in iOS 26 Beta 2 - MacRumors
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Harvey Weinstein Was Abused, Defense Says in Retrial Closing Argument - Variety
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
The Viral "Bucket of Doom" Hack Is the Most CONTROVERSIAL Way to Get Rid of Mosquitos - Yahoo
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Latest WA shipping and tourism numbers tell a depressing story - The Seattle Times
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Non est eum facere impedit aut dignissimos tempora.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump Plans Biofuel Quota Boost, Seeks to Crimp Imports - Bloomberg